FREE ESSAY ON AN INTERTWINING OF HINDUISM AND BUDDHISM

AN INTERTWINING OF HINDUISM AND BUDDHISM

Religion, what is religion? Religion is a way of life, a life style, it should 
dictate how you live your life. However why follow a religious belief, to go to 
heaven, avoid the condemnation to hell, to live forever? We in western society 
consider ourselves a not so religious society, we say I am Christian or I am 
Jew or I am an Atheist I don't believe. Keep in mind religion is a life style, it 
should dictate how you live your life. Sadly in western society, money and our 
compulsive cravings for material objects dictate our life. We are far from the 
highly evolved forms of religions of Hinduism and Buddhism over in the east. 
What are these religions? Buddhism is offshoot/reform of Hinduism. They 
are looked at in the same way as Judaism and Christianity are looked at (very far 
apart). Through this essay, I will prove - by using some of their differences as 
similarities - that they are very much - if not essentially the same - alike. 
As an off shoot of Hinduism, Buddhism accepted the notions of karma, 
dharma, samsara, and moksha. It differed in its understanding ot these terms and 
how to achieve spiritual liberation. As Buddhism spread through south and east 
Asia, these differences became greater. 
Samsara, the upholstered hell , it is known in Hinduism as the endless 
cycle of death and rebirth, and Moksha being the supreme enlightenment, the 
realization of Atman the one's true self, and the liberation from samsara. Despite 
the fact that Moksha means Something different in Buddhism, words are 
meaningless but their meanings aren't. Explanation: The ultimate goal of the 
Buddhist path is release from the round of phenomenal existence with its inherent 
suffering. To achieve this goal is to attain nirvana an enlightened state in which the 
fires of greed, hatred, and ignorance have been quenched. This is the essence of 
both religions, freedom from the ignorance of what I call BlamI.
The central core of Buddhist teachings is the Four Noble Truths, which are:
1. All life is suffering and pain.
This is more than a mere recognition of the presence of suffering in existence. It is a
statement that, in its very nature, human existence is essentially painful from the
moment of birth to the moment of death. Even death brings no relief. 
1. Desire is the root of suffering.
People become attached to relationships or things they have, and suffer when they
experience their impermanence. This impermanence leads to disappointment, which in turn
leads to new cravings. 
My interpretation of this Noble Truth is that we suffer not because we desire but because
we desire the wrong things. Meaning that what we should desire is enlightenment.
2. Suffering and desire can be extinguished with enlightenment.
The noble truth of cessation of suffering is this: It is the complete cessation of that
very thirst , giving it up, renouncing it, emancipating oneself from it detaching oneself
from it.
3. The way to enlightenment is to follow the Noble Eightfold Path.
The Noble Truth of the path leading to the cessation of suffering is this: it is simply
the Noble Eightfold path, namely right view; right thought; right speech; right action;
right livelihood; right effort; right mindfulness; right concentration. 
These concepts are nothing pertaining to Buddhism alone, maybe they 
haven't listed and categorized as four noble truths but all the idea's are 
encompassed in Hinduism's philosophy. 
Buddhism analyzes human existence as made up of five aggregates or 
bundles (skandhas): the material body, feelings, perceptions, predispositions or 
karmic tendencies, and consciousness. A person is only a temporary combination 
of these aggregates, which are subject to continual change. No one remains the 
same for any two consecutive moments. Buddhists deny that the aggregates 
individually or in combination may be considered a permanent, independently 
existing self or soul (atman). Indeed, they regard it as a mistake to conceive of any 
lasting unity behind the elements that constitute an individual. The Buddha held 
that belief in such a self results in egoism, craving, and hence in suffering. Thus he 
taught the doctrine of anatman, or the denial of a permanent soul. He felt that all 
existence is characterized by the three marks of anatman (no soul), anitya 
(impermanence), and dukkha (suffering). The doctrine of anatman made it 
necessary for the Buddha to reinterpret the Indian idea of repeated rebirth in the 
cycle of phenomenal existence known as samsara. Atman: the one's true self, 
the individual self, held by upanisic and Vedatin thought to be identical to 
Brahman, the world soul 
After reading the above paragraph one could concur that the two terms 
atman and anatman are two very different things - actually opposites. However 
one must keep in mind they are different interpretations of one's true self. Every 
thing we do every thought or sight or touch, every calculation in our mind is 
mathematical, therefor if you add these to concepts as if like 1+2 the two terms 
similarities will become evident.
1. If Hindus believe in Brahman as the supreme and ultimate God or reality (because
communion or oneness with Brahman is the main goal) and according to Hinduism our true
self is thought to be like Brahman. 
2. If Buddhist believe in the impermanence of all things including the soul(as stated
above), then if everything is impermanent the only thing that is permanent is the
impermanence of everything or better stated  The Nothing is permanent. This means that
The Nothing is the impermanence in all things.
3. Concept 1+ Concept 2 = Concept 3. One must take into consideration that neither
concept is wrong, simply fuse both concepts together and what seems opposite will become
the same. Therefor Brahman is The Nothing, therefor making atman, anatman.
The caste system now almost non-existent in Hindu society but it was part of 
Hindu society and therefor it sticks out as something that separates Hinduism from 
Buddhism. However, what happens if we delve into the history of the caste system. 
Throughout my research I was unable to find any information regarding the origin 
of the caste system only finding the knowledge of what it is. But I came up with a 
hypothesis of how the caste system came about. Thousands of years ago near the 
beginning of Hinduism I am sure that just like today people were probably 
complaining with regards to why they where born - doomed - into the life they 
where in, and so by using karmic they developed the caste system to explained it. 
Over the years, people in - higher ranks - probably took advantage of this system 
and doomed people to a specific caste using this mere explanation as their defense. 
Over the years it grew name to what it is known as today. What does this have to 
do with Buddhism? Like Hinduism, Buddhism holds the belief of karma and also 
understands why certain people are born into certain levels of society. 
What about Dharma? According to the texts I have studied on Hinduism and 
Buddhism, I have been taught that they both share the word Dharma but it has a 
different meaning in each religion. In Hinduism, it is our life purpose, in Buddhism 
it is the path of the Buddha, which is enlightenment. I can see these two as if they 
have the same meaning. Explanation: one of the major things Hinduism and 
Buddhism share a like is their goal, which is enlightenment. Also as previously 
stated they share the same concept of the endless cycles of death and rebirth, which 
both religions believe is part of soul's development to eventually in - some life or 
other - gain enlightenment. Therefor you could say that in both Hinduism and 
Buddhism the purpose of life or our Dharma is the Dharma, the path to 
enlightenment.
Religion, what is religion? Religion is a way of life, a life style, it should 
dictate how you live your life. However why follow a religious belief, to go to 
heaven, avoid the condemnation to hell, to live for ever? We in western society 
consider ourselves a not so religious society, we say I am Christian or I am 
Jew or I am an Atheist I don't believe. Keep in mind religion is a life style, it 
should dictate how you live your life.
The diverse religions are like the many branches of Thy one immeasurable tree of truth. 
Bibliography
Bibliography
Canadian Bible Society, The. Good News Bible, The. Toronto: Canadian Bible Society. ?
1971.
Giselle's Handouts on Hinduism.
Giselle's Handouts on Buddhism.
Hesse,Hermann. Siddhartha. New York: New Directions Publishing Corporation and Bantom
Books. 4th Edition, ? 1951-1971.
Kapleau, Philip. Wheel of Life and Death, The. New York: Bantam Doubley Dell
PublishingGroup, Inc. ? 1989.
McDermot, P, James. Buddhism. Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 97. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
? 1993-1996.
O'Flaherty, D, Wendy. Hinduism. Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 97. Redmond, WA:
Microsoft. ? 1993-1996.
Tannahill, Ray. Sex In History. Scarborough House/Publishers. ? 1980, 
Revised ?1992.
Yogananda, Paramahansa. A Man's Eternal Quest. Los Angeles: International 
Publication Congress of Self-Realization. ?1975.
-------------------------------. Journey to Self Realization; Discovering the Gifts of
the Soul. Los Angeles: International Publication Congress of Self Realization. ? 1997.
-------------------------------. Faith of the Wise, Faith of the Worldly, Faith of the
Ignorant. Self Realization: aMagazine Devoted to Healing of Body, Mind and Soul. Vol. 67,
No2 (Spring 1996), 0037-1564.