FREE ESSAY ON CENSORSHIP IN SOCIETY

CENSORSHIP IN SOCIETY

If our society decides to have censorship, we compromise our freedom of speech and are
left with the chore of deciding where to draw the illusive and unstable line between what
should be censored and what should not. When the issue of censorship needs to be
addressed question arise such as "Who will enforce it?" and "Who will decide what is
'right'?" Ironically, the people who censor materials to protect the common people do not
have the common persons best interest in mind. It is the people in power who censor to
protect the disempowered and impose the views of a small percentage of society on the
masses. Censorship will never reduce oppression and domination, but add to the problem,
as people are left inane and ignorant. Censorship will never give people comfort and
security for it is often hypocritical and in many times creates conflicts of interest.
Violent and sexually explicit material are tolerated in our mainstream society to a
certain degree. Images of rape and torture are tolerated within this section of our
society within certain circumstance. The rape of the Sabine Women, the Martyrdom of St.
Agathe and the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ are iconographic pictures which many artists
throughout history have depicted and are consistently shown within art museums. While
these are being represented in many places, a work of art, which challenges our modern
culture, will face resistance and censorship due to homophobic, sexist and racist
reactions. But go many places and it is easy to find degrading images of women in porn
magazines to mainstream advertising. Why government bureaucrats get to see material that
they forbid the rest of us to see is outrageous. Not only do they not have to pay for the
material in question; we actually pay them to see it. If the rational for censorship is
that obscene material automatically corrupts minds and produces anti-social 
behaviors, then what is the same material doing to the minds of Canada Customs officers
and other people in power? Many bookstores have taken a stand against censorship,
including many gay and lesbian bookstores. These places come under hard times for they
are constantly under attack by police and Canada customs. What makes the targeting of
Canada's gay and lesbian bookstores particularly offensive, is that those people who
would be offended by the material in question are not likely to be shopping at one in the
first place.
Although censorship may be ignorant and barbaric, it has always been a part of
civilization. In days of the Nazis and in earlier years, people resorted to book burning
when books were handwritten and very few copies existed. Book Burning would be a shocking
thing to see at the present time, so other methods have been brought into practice. To be
effective, censors have found devious ways to restrict access to publications, which are
deemed offensive and dangerous, and have sadly succeeded. Because of this, many authors'
books have been wrongly banned often because of sexual and political reference. Amazing
minds such as Noam Chomsky and D.H. Lawrence have had their books banned periods of time
when the public should be engrossed in this knowledge. In the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, it states that everyone has, "freedom of thought, belief, opinion and
expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication." But the
people in power have bent and broken this freedom so often and extensively that it has
become commonplace in today's society.
The problem is not that there is too much information, it is that there is not enough.
When our government imposes the iron hand of censorship, the most important things are
left in the dark and left out of the picture. The things effecting the population the
most are banned, seized, and burned; this does not help anybody and only creates
confusion and conflict. People are smart enough to make decisions for themselves and this
is exactly what is true in Charles Bradlaugh's quote: "Without free speech no search for
truth is possible... no discovery of truth is useful... Better a thousandfold abuse of
free speech than denial of free speech. The abuse dies in a day, but the denial slays the
life of the people, and entombs the hope of the race.