Free Essays, Free Research Papers, Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers
Need Essays Free Essays, Free Research Papers,
Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers

FREE ESSAY ON HOW JULIUS CAESAR CHANGED ROME

College Term Papers - Instant Download

(sponsored links)

"Julius Caesar" and "The Republic"
Compares Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and Plato's "Republic" -- 2,653 words; MLA

Julius Caesar and Augustus
An analysis of why Augustus was able to found a stable and enduring monarchy while Julius Caesar failed. -- 1,416 words; MLA

Julius Caesar
An outline of the reign of Julius Caesar. -- 1,095 words; MLA

Julius Caesar
A review of the life of Julius Caesar. -- 1,757 words; MLA

The Motivation for the Murder of Julius Caesar
An examination of the motivation for the 'liberators' in their assassination of Julius Caesar. -- 1,842 words; APA

Click here for more essays on HOW JULIUS CAESAR CHANGED ROME

HOW JULIUS CAESAR CHANGED ROME

the ill P
Gaius Julius Caesar helped establish the vast Roman Empire. Caesar's triumph in a civil
war in the 40s BC made him the absolute ruler of Rome. Caesar was neither good nor bad,
rather, he was a force of change. His folly was ambition, for when he took power the way
to advance changed so drastically that the other Roman's ambitions were thwarted, which
lead to political jealousies among his opponents and his assassination. 
Caesar's rise to power obliterated the traditional way of attaining high office in Rome.
When Caesar 'became' the Republic, he inadvertently created new needs: a need to be among
Caesar's circle of friends, a need to feel important in the eyes of the Dictator, a need
to be rewarded by Caesar in accordance with one's expectations. The need to gain Caesar's
approval was felt in varying degrees by different individuals, according to their
goal(s), and, most importantly, their own perceptions of success in meeting these goals.

Thus, even a recipient of an important magistracy might have been disappointed if he had
been hoping for a higher office, a different or earlier appointment, or inclusion in an
inner circle. When Caesar made himself responsible for all important decisions, he
fostered a dangerous atmosphere in which those whom he disappointed, frustrated because
of an inability to better their position by constitutional means, could easily focus
their anger directly upon Caesar; it was Caesar's friends, nurturing the highest
expectations, who felt this relative deprivation most keenly.
Although times were uncertain and lives were at stake, men placed much emphasis on their
own advancement at the nod of Caesar. To achieve their goals, individuals fell over
themselves in a gushing forth of self-seeking flattery recorded by ancient writers as
occurring primarily after the death of Pompey, during Caesar's visit to Rome after
Thapsus, and, most especially, during Caesar's final stay in Rome when there were no
limits to his power. 
Caesar's response to these exaggerated overtures was equally exaggerated. In a major
effort to gain acceptance, Caesar encouraged hope in everyone and made promises to many,
resulting in a backlog of favors owed. His efforts to reward individuals and to
ingratiate himself to Roman society were tireless: he abdicated his first dictatorship;
he resigned his consulship in 45, yielding the office to two important lieutenants; he
gave honors and offices to former enemies; he placated captured soldiers; he displayed
clemency; he tried to assuage the populace both generally and specifically (e.g., with
debt and rent relief); he was attentive to his soldiers; he made conciliatory speeches.
He rewarded as many as he was able with offices, priesthoods, senatorial seats, money,
and land sales. Senators received priesthoods and offices, while knights, centurions and
subordinates officers received seats in the senate. 
But when Caesar found that Republican tradition limited his capability to reward to a
magistracy, a priesthood, or a pecuniary, he augmented his ability to reward as a matter
of policy. He increased the number of praetors, quaestors, senate seats, aediles and
priesthoods. He appointed men to future magistracies. He resigned his own office to
appoint others. He ignored tradition to reward followers.
Cicero makes comment about the way in which Caesar had converted political office into a
'sad joke' -
At one o'clock, Caesar announced the election of a consul to serve until 1 January -
which was the next morning. So I can inform you that in Canninus' consulship, nobody had
lunch. Still, nothing untoward occurred while he was consul: such was his vigilance that
throughout his consulship, he did not sleep a wink! 
His further comment, also showed his opinion of what Caesar had turned the political
magistracies into:
...you could not help but weep... there are countless similar instances. 
Thus, as Caesar's power grew, his situation became ever more perilous, one reason being
that he was not able to reward everyone to the level of their expectations. Resentment
came from several quarters. Senators resented unworthy appointments to their ranks.
Caesar's soldiers resented the length of time they remained in service and rewards that
did not meet expectations. The soldiers also resented former prisoners of war now
enrolled in Caesar's army receiving equal pay and occupying positions equal to, or higher
than, their own and jeered at comrades who were fortunate enough to be elevated to the
senate. There was hostility when Caesar would not allow profiteering from confiscated
land
In sum, Caesar was not able to eliminate resentment by meeting the needs of all the power
seekers. His disappointed friends, expecting much, would feel the deprivation deeply.
Some of them joined the conspiracy.
Caesar did not guard against resentment and hatred by creating a buffer between him and
those seeking power; there was no cabinet or advisory board at which men could direct
their resentment. There was, in addition, no Caesar-directed policy for appointments; men
were promoted as his nod. For the power seekers, the comfort of traditional Roman ways of
doing politics was gone. With ambiguous rules, uncertainty and hostility were inevitable.
Thus, the emergence of Caesar-dependent needs suggested in paragraph one was even more
important. One's reaction to unsatisfied goals could be very personal, directed at Caesar
himself. In fact, resentment was very likely felt most deeply by Caesar's friends and
supporters, who had reason to expect the most.
In sum Caesar's rise to power was too different and Caesar was unable placate the rest of
the Roman politician's ambition and as his power grew his position grew more perilous.
Ironically his skill in government lead to his downfall.
Bibliography
"Caesar" March 31, 1999. http://www.virgil.org/caesar/primary-sources.htm 
(April 10, 00)
Meier, Christian. Caesar: A Biography, 1982. Harper Collins
Plutarch. Caesar, 75, MIT Classics Archive 
Suetonius, C. Tranquillus. The Twelve Caesars. 1957 Penguin

Use the Search box at the top to find Term Papers for Sale by keywords or browse Free Essays page by page
(sorted alphabetically by Essay Title):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
For college-level Term Papers, Essays, Research Papers and Book Reports, please go to the Term Papers for Sale Website


This Free Essays Web Site, is Copyright © 2012, Essay Express. All rights reserved.




Partner websites: Interior Decor Art :: Immigration Lawyer Toronto :: Original Acrylic and Oil Paintings :: Learn Violin in Thornhill :: Learn to play violin in Toronto :: Cello Lessons in Toronto :: Buy used Yamaha piano in Toronto