FREE ESSAY ON KNOWLEDGE AS JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF

KNOWLEDGE AS JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF

Intro to Phil
Knowledge as Justified True Belief
Reprinted from The Collected Dialogues of Plato (1961) edited by Edith Hamilton and
Huntington Cairns. Plato (ca. 428 to 348 B.C.) a student of Socrates, teacher of
Aristotle and a giant of Western philosophy, best know for his classical theory of ideal
forms. 
Plato writes of a philosopher, Socrates, who appears to question everything down to its
most simple form. This particular dialogue deals with knowledge and it's qualifications.
Throughout this Dialogue Socrates is the teacher and Theaetetus the student. Socrates
questions Theaetetus' views on the true belief of knowledge. Theaetetus first states that
knowledge is true belief. Socrates asserts that  you will find a whole profession that
truth is not knowledge. He explains that lawyers use their skills to make people believe
whatever they want them to believe. Theaetetus then comments that true belief with the
addition of an account was knowledge. But Socrates again, questions that idea and argues
that in order for this to be true it must be changed around. He first defines the word
account and breaks the definition up into three parts. The first part of the word
account, according to Socrates, is giving overt expression to one's thought by means of
vocal sound with names and verbs. The second part of the meaning is being able to name
some mark by which the thing one is asked about differs from everything else. Combining
the first two definitions of account Socrates defines the third part as, putting your
differentness into words because the correct notion of anything must itself include the
differentness of that thing. He then says that an account added to true belief yields
knowledge in its most perfect form. But he finally comes to a definition of knowledge
that both, he and Theaetetus are satisfied with: 'Correct belief together with knowledge
of a differentness,' for, according to it, 'adding an account' will come to that. 
Throughout the time I was reading this dialogue I found many of Socrates thoughts to be
intriguing. His first point, true belief is not knowledge, was explained clearly by his
example. I agree that by convincing or making someone believe something to be 'true',
doesn't necessarily classify as truth or knowledge. 
I found Socrates breakdown of the word account to be very insightful. I strongly believe
in his three parts of the word account and their relationship to each other and Socrates
final definition of knowledge. Although I get frustrated Socrates' method of questioning
everything into simple form; I understand that you can't have knowledge of something you
can't explain.