FREE ESSAY ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Kozol feels that the way in which we fund public schools is arcane and unfair (54). Since
most
areas in the US rely on property tax in order to fund education, the poorer districts are
at a
disadvantage over the wealthy districts because of lack of income. This is a problem
because the
wealthy schools keep getting wealthier and the poor schools keep getting poorer. For
example
Kozol points to the inner city schools of Chicago in comparison with a suburban high
school
(New Trier). He states that the schools like New Trier receive about $90000 more dollars
a year
than the inner city schools, when the inner city schools could really use that money to
fix up the
facilities, improve the curriculum, and provide the teachers with better salaries and
resources. If
you take a look at the arguments being made on pages 54-56 you will see that Kozol
points
specifically to the property tax as a problem in education funding. "The very poor
communities
place high priority on education, and they often tax themselves at higher rates than do
the very
affluent communities," (55). 
The problem with this is that even though the lower class is taking more money and
trying
to put it towards education, it is not going to even out because the suburbs have more
money
coming back to them that they can throw at schools in order to finance education. He also
states
on these pages that consistent inequality of education will lead to continued inequality
all through
the loves of children of urban areas. I have to agree with Kozol and his findings with
respect to
property tax because of how I was raised. I have never been in a situation where I had to
settle
for the "second best" when it came to education. I was fortunate enough to attend a
school
system that offered a wide array of opportunities and had lots of property tax money to
distribute
among the schools and curriculums to keep it interesting, innovative, and exciting. I
agree that
there is an unfair burden that hangs over those not only in really urban areas, but also
in extremely
rural cases as in the school district 20 minutes down the street from me. This is an
issue that
appeared a lot in Kozol's discussion and will be brushed upon again here and there later
on in the
essay. 
The second thing that is discussed that directly relates to what Kozol targeted as the
problems with education and funding, is the possible things that we can do to change the
way that
things are handled in these situations. He suggests that a property tax is not the
solution to the
problem because it is not doing anything for the poor districts except setting them
farther behind
the really wealthy districts. He feels that if we can offer more money to the really poor
districts to
help them along, then they might be able to stand a chance against the schools that are
already so
far ahead. A property tax only takes the poorer districts and sets them farther and
farther behind
the richer districts giving them no way of really catching up and Kozol is saying that
financing
education in a way that helps the urban schools compete in the "great education race" is
something not something that should be done, but something that has to be done. 
The third and fourth issues that I have to deal with both tie in with one another. They
relate to the great debate of Liberal versus Conservative. The things that Kozol suggests
about
what should be done reflects upon the idea that he is a bleeding heart liberal. A
bleeding heart
liberal is someone that will give to every cause in some way, shape, or form in order to
help them
solve the problems that they are faced with and more importantly get the message out
about their
cause. He wants what is the best for everyone, not just one specific group. Everyone is
fundamentally entitled to an education that provides them with great opportunities for
when they
are faced with problems in the "real world". His view is on that most Liberals share with
respect
to education and education finance. The liberals believe that things should benefit
everyone in
society as a whole regardless of race, creed, education, income, where you love, and so
on. They
believe that equal funding is absolutely necessary in order to ensure everyone to the
same kind of
education. The Liberal motto could be best summarized as "I have this money and I need
to
spend it to help better society." The Conservative on the other hand is the total
opposite. They
do not really give a care about what is good for society, they only care about what is
best for
themselves. They feel that a legislation such as property tax is not a bad thing because
everyone
benefits from it even if it is not in the most equal ways. Their motto could essentially
reflect
something along the lines of "I have money and it is all mine, nothing really matters
except my
happiness."
The final point that I have to discuss is my opinion on the ideas that Kozol presents.
First
off I have to admit that I have read this book about five times and love it. It is a
coffee table book
at my house. Just by telling you that piece of information and by hearing what I have had
to
discuss with respect to the issues at hand in Savage Inequalities I can honestly tell you
that I am a
Liberal. There is nothing that any Conservative could say to me that could make me change
my
mind about the way that I feel education should be funded. The idea of voucher systems in
which
parents can obtain a slip of paper that will take their child out of a poor school and
put them into
a private school or a better public school is ridiculous. This system takes away money
from the
districts that actually need it and gives it back to the districts that would not hurt
one bit if they
had to go without an extra $50000 a year or so. Another thing that I also see as a big
problem
with education in urban areas is the idea of magnet schools. As quoted by Kozol from the
Chicago Tribune magnet schools are essentially "private school systems operated within
the public
schools." The idea of a magnet school is to take the students that are from richer areas
and send
them to a school that provides them with a better atmosphere and a greater chance for
success. 
The poorer students in the city have to settle for the poor schools because they are not
usually
included in the magnet school system, nor are they included in the arcane voucher system.
In
conclusion through the reading of the selected sections of Savage Inequalities as well as
through
my personal experience in the education system, I have demonstrated the problem with the
education system today and what has to be done. 
Bibliography
Kozol, Johnathon. Savage Inequalities. Harper Collins: New York 1991.