Free Essays, Free Research Papers, Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers
Need Essays Free Essays, Free Research Papers,
Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers

FREE ESSAY ON US BASES IN THE PHILIPPINES

College Term Papers - Instant Download

(sponsored links)

The Philippines Economy
This paper examines the reasons the Philippines was not as greatly affected by the Asian financial crisis as compared to Thailand. -- 2,500 words; APA

The U.S. in the Philippines.
Examines the U.S involvement In the Philippines during Mckinley's Presidency. -- 1,900 words;

America & The Philippines
This paper is a historical overview of American imperialism in the Philippines. -- 970 words; MLA

The Philippines
An analysis of American author, Stanley Karnow's theory that America used the Philippines as a colonial bastion against political ideologies it disliked, such as communism. -- 855 words; APA

The Philippines
This paper discusses the U.S. colonization of the Philippines, which although pledged to be altruistic, proved to support a hidden agenda. -- 1,465 words; APA

Click here for more essays on US BASES IN THE PHILIPPINES

US BASES IN THE PHILIPPINES

INTRODUCTION
The longest relationship between the United States of America and a Southeast Asian
country has been the US military involvement in the Philippines. For almost a century,
the US military had use of two major bases in the Philippines, Clark Air Force Base, and
Subic Naval Station. It took a strong anti-nuclear, anti-imperialist mass movement and a
majority vote in the Philippine Senate to finally end the long US military occupation. 
The 1991 US military withdrawal from the Philippines was expected to cause a "power
vacuum" that would have adverse economic and political effects on the former US colony.
Was this really the case in the Philippines? Did the U.S. pull out cause economic havoc
and wide spread political unrest or was the Philippine government able to compensate for
this great economic and security loss? 
This paper will examine how the American Military presence influenced the politics and
economy of the Philippines and what affect the eventual withdrawal had on the country. It
will also examine what the Philippine government has done to compensate for the power
vacuum caused by the US Base closures. Though I will rely primarily on outside sources, I
will also present my own observations having lived in the former base area (Central
Luzon) for two years (1994-1996) immediately following the U.S. base withdrawal.
Historical Background to US Bases
After the United States "liberated" the Philippines from Spanish rule, Subic Bay was
designated as principal US naval station in the Philippines in 1901. A naval base was
constructed and became operational in 1907. It became the largest training facility for
the US Marines prior to World War I. In 1902, Fort Stotsenberg, renamed Clark Air Base in
1947, was established in Pampanga province. 
After World War II, US and Philippine authorities signed a military bases agreement in
March 1947, eight months after the Philippines obtained nominal independence. That same
year, the Truman Doctrine was proclaimed and the US campaign to "contain Communism"
began. Clark Air Base became the headquarters of the 13th Air Force and Subic became a
forward station for the Seventh Fleet. 
Clark and Subic played a key logistical role in support of the US forces in the Korean
War from 1950 to 1953. From 1965 to 1975, the US bases served as logistical fulcrums of
the US war of intervention in Indochina. Air traffic at Clark reached as high as 40
transports per day, all bound for Vietnam . In 1966, the duration of the bases agreement
was reduced from 99 to 25 years, with the treaty to expire on September 16, 1991. 
During the oil crisis of the '70s, regular deployment of Subic-based naval units to the
Indian Ocean began. Carrier task forces from Subic were deployed to the Indian Ocean and
Arabian Sea during the Iranian revolution and North Yemen-South Yemen border war in 1979
and Soviet intervention in Afghanistan in late 1979 and 1980 . 
In August 1983, former Senator Benigno Aquino was assassinated and the country was in
crisis. The anti-dictatorial movement was gaining strength and was led by the slain
senator's widow, Cory Aquino. Marcos called a snap election in 1986. The opposition led
by Aquino called for the withdrawal of the US bases. 
After Marcos was deposed in a popular uprising led by Aquino, Ramos, Enrile and Cardinal
Sin in February 1986, a new constitution was adopted a year later. It stated that after
expiration of the bases treaty in September 1991, "foreign military bases, troops or
facilities, shall not be allowed" in the country unless a new treaty was ratified by a
two-thirds vote of the Senate . In 1991, President Aquino broke her election promises and
campaigned for the bases' extension but on September 16, hundreds of thousands marched
outside the Senate as it voted 12-11 to reject the new treaty . 
Economic Effects of the Bases
The Economic impact of the US Bases on the Philippine economy was undoubtingly
significant. The US military spent over $500 million a year in the country on salaries,
the purchase of supplies and services, and other military and economic aid given to the
Philippine government. One estimate claimed that the total amount of economic
contribution amounted to as much as US$ 1 billion annually . In March of 1987 the
Philippine News reported that the bases employed 23,168 full-time workers, 22,834
contract workers, and 444 concessionaires for a total of 46,446 Filipinos with annual
salaries totaling $96 million . The US Information Service claimed that, "The U.S.
facilities create a great deal of indirect employment by doing business with Philippine
companies - over 900 had contracts with the bases in 1985…." The Bases seemed to be
pumping in millions of U.S dollars into an impoverished economy.
Yet these figures can be quite misleading. Direct Filipino employment on the U.S. bases
only amounted to some 5% of the total 1.18 million Filipinos employed by the Philippine
government at that time . Patricia A. Paez calculated that the bases only actually
employed less than 1% of the total Philippine "non-agriculture workforce" . These
statistics make the U.S. claim that it was the largest employer in the country, apart
from the Philippine government, appear rather weak. 
Furthermore, the Philippines' Jose W. Diokno Foundation (named after a well known
Filipino nationalist) makes the point that bases' contribution to the Philippine economy
was actually consumption of "commodity items" and not "capital investment". "The bulk of
base contribution are spent on labor - both legitimate labor and labor for entertainment
purposes. Thus Filipino men, women and Children are transformed into commodity items" .
In effect, base contributions did not actually assist in development of the Philippine
economy. Also, U.S. Economic assistance regularly demands that the Philippines purchase
only U.S. goods, which forced the Philippines into buying often higher priced goods than
could have been bought on the world marketplace.
The Philippine Government Response
Although some Government officials argued that the economic benefits of the bases
warranted their retention, others argued that more productive uses could be found for the
bases after the U. S withdrawal. The only question was how this conversion was to take
place. As a result the Legislative-Executive Bases Council (LEBC) was created to
formulate a comprehensive program to convert former and existing facilities into
alternative productive civilian uses .
The LEBC Mapped out the following alternatives to the economic activities that would
suffer upon the removal of the U.S. Bases:
? In Subic Naval Base, Filipinos could build and repair ships, cars, jeeps, buses, small
boats, tricycles, utensils, hand tools and even build pre-fabricated housing.
? The huge jungle area of Subic could become a national park with its natural resources
and wild creatures.
? Camp John Hay (a recreational USAF base in the Philippine mountains) could be converted
into a tourist area.
? San Miguel Communications Station could be converted into a national and international
communications enterprise, greatly contributing to the upgrading of the Philippine
telecommunications network.
? Portions of Clark Air Base could be distributed into an international airport for
passengers and cargo, and into an industrial center.
The estimated implementation cost of the programs was P158.5 billion for a ten-year
period . It was purported that the private sector would finance half of this amount. It
was then the active private sector participation was first conceived as crucial to the
programs success.
When the U.S. Bases pulled out, there was some initial upheaval as expected in North and
Central Luzon. Not only did the withdrawal affect the economic life of the area, the 1990
earthquake and 1992 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo had laid waste too much of the area. About
42,000 people lost their jobs; not counting the estimated 79,000 additional jobs off base
that depended on the US facility. Business slowed down. Revenues dropped from US$13.8
million in 1991 to $5.8 million in 1992, reaching a low of $2.4 million in 1993. Subic
and its adjacent city, Olongapo, were at a standstill. About a third of the city's
population packed up and moved to other parts of the country. Severe depression swept the
area . It was in this turbulent time that the Bases Conversion Development Authority came
into being by virtue of Republic Act No. 7227 signed by president Corazon Aquino on march
13 1992. The Sole Aim of the BCDA was to accelerate the development of the base
conversions.
Today, the former naval base has become the country's first Freeport, hosting more than
170 companies dealing in manufacturing, retail, warehousing, transshipment, recreation
and tourism. Next to Philippine firms, most of the investors are from Taiwan, followed by
the US and Europe. As of September 1995, investments poured into the Freeport reached $1
billion, with companies employing about 30,000 people . 
A number of factors account for Subic's turnaround. The Americans left good
infrastructure, including one of the best airstrips in Asia. Subic also has an excellent
deep-water harbor, reliable power and communication facilities. Filipino workers in the
area are skilled; they speak English and are easy to train. 
Clark Air Base, a sprawling 28,041-hectare prized property in the heart of central Luzon,
was a major casualty of Mount Pinatubo. After the volcano erupted in 1991, a large part
of the air base was covered with ash, roofs caved in and all the eye could see was a vast
stretch of gleaming, silver-gray land. The disaster hastened the departure of the US
forces from America's largest overseas air base. But it definitely slowed down the
transformation of Clark into a civilian enterprise.
Today, the former Clark Air Base-renamed Clark Special Economic Zone-is rising from the
ashes, catching up with Subic Freeport. The government has since rehabilitated the power
plant and telecommunications facilities and cleared the runways. Offered incentives such
as duty-free importation and waived local and national taxes, local and foreign
businesses have set up shop with investments now reaching over $500 million. Most of
these are industrial and commercial ventures; the rest are aviation-related and tourism
projects. Holiday Inn, guest cottages and a golf course are among the early tourist
amenities. Apart from these, construction of an international airport has begun and part
of it will be open for daytime landing in a few months. From a virtual wasteland four
years ago, Clark has also become a job center. More than 16,000 workers have been
employed, half of the 32,000 base workers displaced in 1991. 
The Political Effects of the U.S. Military in the Philippines
All This great economic revival seems to have been downplayed by the political insecurity
that the base withdrawals brought. The termination of the Military Base Agreement (MBA)
devastated the bilateral security ties with the U.S. Throughout the MBA's existence
security ties have been linked to the terms of the treaty. As a result, the U.S.
withdrawal forced the limelight on the Armed forces of the Philippines (AFP) and its
capacity to protect the country from external as well as internal threats. This has
become the most significant concern affecting the security ties between the two
countries.
Form the inception of the MBA; the United States underwrote much of the security of the
Philippines, clearly establishing a dependency relationship on defense. Former National
Security Advisor Rafael Ileto warned that the country's policy-makers took it for granted
that someone else would always be there to defend the country. This attitude established
the groundwork for the stagnation of the external defense capability of the AFP.
Department of Defense and AFP officials have called attention to the weak capacity of the
AFP to defend the country against external threats, including intrusions by smugglers and
illegal fishermen. Philippine Navy statistics show that between 1986 and October 1990,
there were 819 incidents of illegal incursions involving 1,617 Taiwanese vessels. Only a
few of these were actually apprehended. Philippine Air Force records also show that there
were 231 incursions into the Philippine Air Defense Identification Zone (PADIZ) made by
non-friendly aircraft in the same period. The neglect of the external defense capability
of the AFP has bred political repercussions. A fact-finding commission report showed that
it was partly responsible for demoralization within the AFP and, indirectly, is one of
the causes of the series of coup d' etat that have taken place in the country. 
This dependency on the U.S assistance has another aspect to it. Aside from external
security, the Philippines have also relied on the United States for assistance in the
development of the AFP's internal capabilities. National concerns relating to the
Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), and
recently the military renegades of the RAM-KSP focused these development efforts on the
counter-insurgency and the Philippine Army. As a result of U.S. assistance, AFP gains in
the field and joint negotiations diminished the threat that these groups posed. As an
example, the CPP-NPA has had its regular forces reduced from 25,200 in 1987, to 13,500 by
1992, infiltrating only 18% (down from up to 26% a year before) of the barangays (local
villages). The insurgency, however, had proven resilient in the past and remains a major
threat to the stability of the state.
The focus on the insurgency, however, and the capability of the AFP to fight it also had
its long-term consequences. The external defense capabilities of the AFP were neglected
and the Philippine Navy and Air Force, the services reared for external security,
amounted to almost nothing when dealing with external defense. As a result, theses two
services are also the most affected by the fallout from the U.S. withdrawal.
The Philippine Navy has 21 patrol ships, 22 transport and service vessels, and about 64
small craft with an average of 41 years in service to protect the country's 1.29 million
square kilometers of territorial waters and its 1.69 million square miles of exclusive
economic zone (EEZ). It is the only naval force in the ASEAN region without any missile
capability. Many of the Philippine Navy's ships have limited patrol radius and are not
even considered seaworthy. The termination of the MBA puts it on more uncertain footing
since 28% of its operational requirements were within the bases compensation package. 
The Philippines Air Force (PAF) is in an even worse state, having relied on the United
States for as much as 61% of its operational needs. The PAF retired its aging F-5A
fighters from service in 1992, leaving the country with virtually no air defense.
Modernization plans for the AFP are being held back by financial shortages. The AFP is
trying to appropriate funds for a 10-year modernization program costing US$7 billion. The
program banked on American military assistance when it was initiated in 1990, but when
the bases withdrew these funds were reduced drastically. The only alternative has been
U.S foreign grants and loans that require the recipients provide counterpart funds. In
1992 it was reported that as much as 63% of the PAP fund's pledged US$5.8 Billion in 1989
and 1991 remain unused because of the unavailability of such counterpart funding. 
The Philippines-U.S. security relationship remains in place because of the Mutual Defense
Treaty signed in 1951. The Philippines was guaranteed US. Military intervention if any
situation arose that affected the Philippine national security . During a 1992 Mutual
Defense Meeting, Philippine and American military officials agreed that no radical change
in the bilateral defense and security relationship would be made . Despite this agreement
the US commitment has come under some question with the emergence of the Philippine claim
to the Spratlys.
The Spratly Islands is a generally uninhabited island chain covering 800,000 square
kilometers of the South China Sea. It is believed to contain significant reserves of oil
in addition to its rich marine resources, minerals and hydrocarbon deposits. The
Philippines claims a total are of 93,000 square kilometers, which it collectively calls
the Kalayaan (Freedom) Islands. The Spratlys are also claimed wholly or partly by Brunei,
China, Taiwan, Vietnam, and Malaysia. Presently the dispute over the Spratlys has become
the principal test of the MDT's importance to the Philippine's defense need.
The U.S., however, believes that the Spratlys and any conflict arising from it falls
outside the jurisdiction of the MDT. Morton Smith, spokesperson of the U.S. Embassy to
the Philippines, said that the Kalayaan Islands are excluded from the scope of the treaty
because they were not part of the country's territory when the MDT was signed. The
Philippines had only raised its claim in 1987. The United States, however refuses to take
the side on the issue, and does not recognize the claim of any country on the disputed
islands. Because the U.S. does not recognize the Philippine claim it is not obliged to
come to its aid in the event of armed conflict in that area. 
The Philippines, however, believes that the United States is bound under the MDT to come
to its defense in case of an attack on territory it claims in the South China Sea. During
a 1992 Senate hearing, Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Roberto Romulo stated that
he United states was treaty-bound to support the Philippines in the event of an attack on
Philippine - claimed territory into the South China Sea. 
The Spratly debate is still going on today. This casts some light on the relationship
between the MBA and the MDT. Before the termination of the MBA, the U.S. military and
naval presence provided the Philippines with the physical guarantee of the commitment
embodied in the MDT. The U.S. pull out, however removed this physical evidence. At the
same time, the weakened defense establishment of the Philippines made this commitment
even more critical. As a result the Philippine government has sought to establish a new
agreement that would bring back the U.S. Military presence. 
The current agreement (signed by President Ramos in 1998) is the Visiting Forces
Agreement (VFA) allowing U.S. Military to conduct temporary joint exercises and training
with the AFP. However, the VFA has been the topic of much controversy in current
Philippine politics. In addition to the wide spread student protests, many militant
nationalist groups have already warned that should the VFA be implemented all past peace
negotiations with their groups are void. The future of Philippine-American Military
relations' remains to be seen, but the certainty that these relations are vital to
Philippine security, has drawn the support of the past three Presidents, Aquino, Ramos
and the current day Estrada.
CONCLUSION
The U.S. Military presence in the Philippines has had a profound impact on Philippine
politics and economy. Economically, it was thought that the U.S. pull out would have
devastating effects on the already impoverished economy. However, through the quick
thinking and ingenuity of the Filipino economists and Technocrats put in charge of the
base conversion projects, the Philippine economy not only recovered from the initial
economic crisis but also has experienced phenomenal growth. Economically, the removal of
the U.S. Bases was a step in the right direction. However, the same cannot be said about
the impact the U.S. withdrawal has had on politics, especially on the issue of Philippine
security. 
Even today, the Philippine government is plagued with the problem of internal strife
against the countless rebel groups dissatisfied with the current political agenda that
appears to only benefit the political elite. The great economic growth has had minimal
effect on the masses of Filipino poor who flock to these groups for redemption. In
addition, the Armed Forces of the Philippines have proven to be too ill equipped and
trained to deal with both the internal and eternal threats to their country. In light of
this, I feel the Philippines would do well to consider agreements such as the VFA that
would allow the U.S. Military to aid them while keeping Philippine soil free of U.S.
Bases. If such a compromise cannot be reached there is certainly the option of building
better relations with neighboring South East Asian nations, an option that, in the past,
has not been fully addressed. 

Use the Search box at the top to find Term Papers for Sale by keywords or browse Free Essays page by page
(sorted alphabetically by Essay Title):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
For college-level Term Papers, Essays, Research Papers and Book Reports, please go to the Term Papers for Sale Website


This Free Essays Web Site, is Copyright © 2008, Essay Express. All rights reserved.




Partner websites: Interior Decor Art :: Immigration Lawyer Toronto :: Laser Clinic Toronto :: Original Abstract Paintings :: Learn Violin in Thornhill :: Learn Violin in Toronto :: Buy used Yamaha piano in Toronto